Laterally related topic: Alexander Thom.
The Mathematics and the Liberal Arts pages are intended to be a resource for student research projects and for teachers interested in using the history of mathematics in their courses. Many pages focus on ethnomathematics and in the connections between mathematics and other disciplines. The notes in these pages are intended as much to evoke ideas as to indicate what the books and articles are about. They are not intended as reviews. However, some items have been reviewed in Mathematical Reviews, published by The American Mathematical Society. When the mathematical review (MR) number and reviewer are known to the author of these pages, they are given as part of the bibliographic citation. Subscribing institutions can access the more recent MR reviews online through MathSciNet.
Mathews, Jerold. A Neolithic oral tradition for the van der Waerden/Seidenberg origin of mathematics. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 34 (1985), no. 3, 193--220. (Reviewer: M. Folkerts.) SC: 01A10 (01A25), MR: 88b:01005.
Abraham Seidenberg advanced a theory that mathematics arose from a common origin, and that some the mathematics was preserved by an oral tradition, and very likely a religious tradition, perhaps one like the one seen in the Indian Sulvasutras. Van der Waerden's book Geometry and Algebra in Ancient Civilizations takes a similar views, and in fact van der Waerden credits Seidenberg for making him look at the history of mathematics a new way. As Mathews notes, the Chinese Chiu Chang Suan Shu is very important in van der Waerden's work. Mathews relies heavily on this work as well to "give a small, coherent, and basic core of geometry concerning rectangles and their parts, ..., which may serve as what van der Waerden has called an 'oral tradition current in the Neolithic age.'" He states the he hoped "to give this hypothesized ancient core some credence through its relation to the Chiu Chang and its explanatory power. After giving a thorough discussion of this geometry, he then carefully analyzes the ninth chapter of the Chiu Chang in terms of this core. He is able to find a strong match, though his conclusions on one of the problems (Problem 20) are not consistent with those of some other researchers, who find in problem 20 instead suggestions of something like Horner's method. A very interesting article. Hopefully future papers will discuss how well the author's geometry agrees with the ancient geometry of other cultures. As he notes, "Until I can thoroughly test his conjecture on, say, the Babylonian corpus, I can argue for the merits of my conjecture only on such grounds as the simplicity of explanation it allows, or its congruence with received results or figures." Closely related topics: The Neolithic Era, Religion, Geometry, The Sulvasutras, and The Chiu Chang Suan Shu (Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art).
Seidenberg, A. km, a widespread root for ten. Arch. History Exact Sci. 16 (1976/77), no. 1, 1--16. (Reviewer: Richard L. Francis.) SC: 01A10, MR: 58 #4778.
Seidenberg studies number words in a wide variety of languages and finds some surprising similarities. He argues from these similarities that these number words, and therefore the corresponding number concepts, arose one place and spread throughout the world by a diffusion process. Here, and also in his article Seidenberg, A., The ritual origin of counting, he notes several similarities in the construction of number words in three languages that are built on the number words for one and two (Gumulgul in Australia, Bakairi in South America, and of the Bushmen in South Africa). These include the fact that in building odd numbers, the word one comes at the end, and also the fact that there is on connective. Similarities like these seem particularly natural under the diffusion hypothesis. However, the strongest evidence would come from number words themselves; for as Seidenberg notes, "If the number-vocabularies of the Gumulgul, the Bakairi, and the Bushman had been the same, and not merely the same in structure, probably everybody, or nearly everybody, would concede that the words derive from a single source." In fact, Seidenberg does find that one root, km, seems to appear in many number words world-wide. After looking at a wide variety of languages, Seidenberg concludes (p. 11) that the original word km meant "one", and thereafter began to be used for "one" larger unit, and particularly for the unit ten. He also finds at least one example of the root km meaning four; one wonders if perhaps this use might even have predated its use for ten. There have been attempts to explain the proto Indo-European root for ten in a way that conflicts with Seidenberg's theory; the notion of ten as "two hands" seems popular. Seidenberg discusses these attempts, but feels that they are rather ad hoc. Certainly from the point of a mathematician, Seidenberg's theory is very appealing. Closely related topics: Number Words and Number Systems.
Seidenberg, A. On the volume of a sphere. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 39 (1988), no. 2, 97--119. (Reviewer: K.-B. Gundlach.) SC: 01A20 (01A15 01A17 01A25 01A32), MR: 89j:01012.
Abraham Seidenberg argues that there is a common source for Pythagorean and Chinese (or Chinese-like) mathematics. He suggests that Old-Babylonian mathematics is a derivative of a more ancient mathematics having a much clearer geometric component (p. 104), and is "in some respects ... is derivative of a Chinese-like mathematics" (p. 109). Van der Waerden holds a similar view on this, and tells us that the mathematics of the Chiu Chang Suan Shu represents the common source more faithfully than the Babylonian does. Seidenberg believes that the common source is most similar to the Sulvasutras. He discusses how questions of the sphere and the circle were treated by the Greeks, Chinese, Egyptians, and to a lesser extent Indians. He discusses the some similarities and differences in the work on the sphere in Greece (Archimedes, with a very brief account of the application of his Method), and in Chinese (first in the Chiu Chang Suan Shu, improved by Liu Hui or perhaps Tsu Ch'ung-Chih, and then further improved by the Tsu Ch'ung-Chih's son Tsu Keng-Chih). He believes that the problem of the volume of a sphere goes back to the common source, to the first part of the second millennium B.C. or earlier. An interesting and related topic is the topic of the equality of the proportionality constants pi that occur in the formulas for the area and circumference of a circle. Seidenberg examines the Moscow Papyrus, Chinese sources, and an Old-Babylonian text and finds that this fact seemed to be recognized in all three groups. He argues that the Egyptian, Babylonian, and Chinese approaches to the volume of a truncated pyramid may have derived from the same common source. He believe that the common source also used infinitesimal, Cavalieri-type, arguments as well. It is interesting as well that Heron, who as Seidenberg notes is sometimes considered to be continuing the Babylonian tradition, gives the formula 1/2(s+p)p+1/14(1/2s)2 for the area of a segment of a circle with chord s and height (sagita, arrow) p (with an Archimedean value of 22/7 for pi), and "that the 'ancients' took [the area as] 1/2(s+p)p and even conjectured that they did so because they took pi = 3." The paper is also interesting in that he discusses the development of some of his ideas from his early papers in the 60s until much later (the paper was received soon before his death). Closely related topics: The Sphere, The Circle, The Pythagoreans, China, The Chiu Chang Suan Shu (Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art), Sumerians and Babylonians, The Sulvasutras, Archimedes, Archimedes' Method, The Moscow Mathematical Papyrus, and Heron.
Seidenberg, A. The ritual origin of counting. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 2 (1962b), 1-40.
It is common to argue that counting and other elementary mathematics arose spontaneously throughout the world in response to a practical, or perhaps psychological, need. Abraham Seidenberg argues instead for a diffusion theory, that counting arose only once, and then spread throughout the world. In fact, many common associations with numbers suggest such a common origin. One such association that Seidenberg is the idea that odd numbers are male and even numbers are female; this is certainly well known from the Pythagoreans, but turns out to be nearly universal. Seidenberg proposes that counting in fact originally arose in a ritual context. Seidenberg draws from a wide variety of anthropological sources for rituals and myths that hint at what this common origin might have been. He finds that counting "was frequently the central feature of a rite, and that participants in ritual were numbered." He focuses more specifically on creation rituals. He suggests that in the enaction of creation myths, men and women may have come onto the scene alternately, easily explaining the odd/male even/female association. He finds that his ideas clarify "pure 2-counting, which is the oldest stratum of counting we can detect." In pure-2 counting, there are separate words for one and two and these are used to form all other number words. He illustrates this with number words from diverse languages such as the Gumulgal of Australia, the Bakairi of South America, and the Bushmen of South Africa. He sheds additional light on his hypothesis with discussions of the possible origin of counting taboos (and connections with ritual sacrifice), of ancient one-one-correspondence "tally" systems (e.g., counting people with stones), of taxation systems, of money, and of gematria. Seidenberg also gives us some fascinating examples of counting in world religions. These include the analogy The Lord : His people = the shepherd : his sheep, the analogy The shepherd : his sheep = the moon : the stars. These two lead one to expect the moon to count the stars; and Seidenberg in fact finds evidence of this in ancient Babylonia. He argues from the equation The Lord's people = the stars of the heaven to The Lord's people = the sand upon the seashore that one would expect to find a ritual counting of sand. In fact, he finds the notion of Counter of the Sands both in Buddhism and among the Ancient Greeks. The equation The Lord = The Counter seems to be confirmed in two of the ninety-nine beautiful names of Allah, namely The Counter and the Reckoner; and there is further confirmation in Chapter's XV and XIX of the Qu'ran. This is a fascinating article, connecting mathematics with a wide variety of disciplines. Closely related topics: Myth and Ritual, Storytelling Traditions, Anthropology, General, Counting, TallySystems, Taxation, Number Words, The Pythagoreans, Gematria, Religion, and The Islamic World.
Seidenberg, A. The ritual origin of the circle and square. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 25 (1981), no. 4, 269--327. (Reviewer: M. P. Closs.) SC: 01A10 (51-03), MR: 83h:01008.
Abraham Seidenberg advances a theory that the circle first arose in the context of the ritual enactment of a creation myth. In many cases, stars seem to play an important role in these myths. Seidenberg's research suggests that participants in these myths generally moved in a circle in imitation of the stars in the heavens. It is interesting that individuals in these societies often move in the same direction as the stars, and movement in the opposite direction is often considered unlucky. The fact that the Aztec god Tezcatlipoca is missing is right foot, forcing him to walk clockwise in a circle may be related. Seidenberg suggests that the creation myth is the origin for the dance around the may pole, which is for example observed near the summer solstice in northern Scandinavia today. Analogous rituals may play (or have played) a role in a wide variety of other cultures as well; examples are found in the Aztecs, ancient Indians, American Indians, and Greeks. (Spinning tops may have a ritual significance as well.) Special support is given to Seidenberg's these through the fact that in some cases, a pole may have been set up at an angle so as to point towards the pole star. Seidenberg notes that the moon might have motivated the circle rather than the stars, but the sun is unlikely to. His investigations tend to confirm this, and also suggest that lunar culture is older than solar culture. Seidenberg believes that the square arose from the circle, through the process of dividing a group into a dual organization, where for example members of one group marry someone in the other group and also (as he notes) play complementary roles in ritual. If a society divides a second time, one can think of it dividing the tribal circle into four parts. He finds some evidence of this as well. The four parts naturally define a square. His theory therefore implies that the circle arose first and that the square arose as a dual form of the circle; there is some other evidence (e.g., architectural) that may tend to confirm this. Seidenberg mentions several interesting dualities involving the circle and the square. The Altar of Heaven in Peking, for example, exhibits the equations Heaven : Earth = circle : square = three : two = South : North = White : Yellow. In Sinhalese art he finds the equation circle : square = standing : sitting. In the Omaha tribe he finds the equations that Sky : Earth = superior : inferior = one : two. He also notes the equations Heaven : Earth = Male : Female and Male : Female = one : two. The former is well known, and the latter is extensively discussed in Seidenberg, A., The ritual origin of counting The ancient Egyptians appear to be an exception as they associated the square with the earth and the circle with the sky. A fascinating paper. Closely related topics: Myth and Ritual, Religion, Anthropology, General, The Circle, Kinship Systems, and The Square.
Seidenberg, A. and Casey, J. The ritual origin of the balance. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 23 (1980/81), no. 3, 179--226. (Reviewer: M. P. Closs.) SC: 01A10, MR: 82j:01008.
The author's trace the beginnings of the balance back to a rituals where principals contended against each other on a kind of see-saw (somewhat similar sports are of course known from medieval times). The grain-crusher and water-lifter are similar, and perhaps derived from, the see-saw; the fact that one stands on these suggested to the authors that the contestants may have been standing on the see-saw. The authors note that in ancient Egypt, one's heart was believed to be weighed against a feather in order to decide whether one would be able to enter the afterlife. Other parts of the body, such as hair, can be used to represent an individual, and in other instances these may have been weighed instead; the authors give examples of rites where hair is weighed. An interesting use of the balance in Greece is from the Iliad where Zeus weighs Achilles and Hector on pans of a balance. "That of Hector sinks toward Hades and Hector falls, slain by Achilles." An even more interesting weighing ritual was once common in the far east, where a ruler was balanced against a quantity of a precious substance such as gold, and gave that substance (and thereby symbolically himself) to his people. The authors found many other interesting examples in a wide variety of cultures and world religions. The authors believe that only items of ritual significance were weighed at first, and that widespread commercial use came much later. Although the authors don't focus greatly on this, they also briefly discuss the different kinds of balances (and the balance-like instrument used to carry loads on the shoulders) and the weight multiples that were used on balances. Closely related topics: The Balance and the Measurement of Weight, Myth and Ritual, Religion, Sports, Ancient Egypt, Greece, and The Islamic World.