To refine search, see subtopic Archimedes' Method. To expand search, see Greece. Laterally related topics: Diophantus, Aristotle, Euclid, Heron, The Pythagoreans, Eudoxus, Ptolemy (Claudius Ptolemaeus), The Liberal Arts, Plutarch, Chrysippus, Xenocrates, Hipparchus, Manuel Moschopoulos, Plato, Zeno, Philolaus, and Archytas.
The Mathematics and the Liberal Arts pages are intended to be a resource for student research projects and for teachers interested in using the history of mathematics in their courses. Many pages focus on ethnomathematics and in the connections between mathematics and other disciplines. The notes in these pages are intended as much to evoke ideas as to indicate what the books and articles are about. They are not intended as reviews. However, some items have been reviewed in Mathematical Reviews, published by The American Mathematical Society. When the mathematical review (MR) number and reviewer are known to the author of these pages, they are given as part of the bibliographic citation. Subscribing institutions can access the more recent MR reviews online through MathSciNet.
Hansen, David W. The Dependence of Mathematics on Reality. Mathematics Teacher 64 (1971), 715--19.
Discusses how the greatest mathematicians have been vitally concerned with the real world. Uses Archimedes, Newton, and Gauss as examples. Archimedes did so much applied work that it is hard to see how he fits Plutarch's description of considering mechanical work ignoble and inferior. The case of Newton is of course well known. An interesting example is Gauss, who used the motto "Thou, nature art my goddess;to thy laws/My services are bound" from Shakespeare's King Lear. Newton and Gauss were also very interested in religion. Philosophy was very important to Gauss. Reprinted in Swetz, Frank J., From Five Fingers to Infinity. Closely related topics: Applied Mathematics (General), Isaac Newton (1642-1727), Karl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855), Religion, and Philosophy. Also possibly relevant: Literature.
Knight, Gordon. The geometry of Maori art---spirals. New Zealand Math. Mag. 22 (1985), no. 1, 4--7. (Reviewer: H. S. M. Coxeter.) SC: 51N20 (01A10), MR: 87m:51060.
The Maoris frequently use spirals in their tattoos and wood carvings. These appear very much like the spirals of Archimedes, but often interlace two or more such spirals. Although the easiest way to construct a spiral similar to the spiral of Archimedes may be to use sets of concentric semicircles (or other segments of circles) offset with respect to one another, the author believes that the Maoris didn't use this technique. "In Spirals of Archimedes, and, it seems, in Maori spirals, there is a gradual, rather than an abrupt, change in curvature." The author gives several examples from Maori artwork; there are examples with 2, 3, and 4 interlaced spirals. The author notes that the 3 spiral form is more common in tattooing patterns than in carving. Apparently there was once a 6 spiral pattern on one of the figures guarding the gateway of Papawai Pa. The center of the spiral can be varied somewhat; for example, two spirals can come together in an S-curve. In one case, "the plain ridges, which form an S-curve, are made to cross over the notched spirals, giving a woven effect. According to Phillips this was chiefly an Arawa modification." The author concludes with a note that the spiral of Archimedes should perhaps have a Maori name instead. He suggests that an investigation of these spirals might be useful in mathematics education (when polar coordinates are studied). Closely related topics: Spirals, The Maori, Tattoos, Wood Carving, and Education.
Palter, Robert. Black Athena, Afro-centrism, and the history of science. Hist. Sci. 31 (1993), no. 93, part 3, 227--287. (Reviewer: Donald Cook.) SC: 01A16 (01A07 01A20 01A70), MR: 94i:01001.
Martin Bernal's Black Athena created a bit of a sensation when it first came out. Robert Palter discusses aspects of Bernal's article and also other arguments of afro-centrists. Palter particularly focuses on the question of whether Egyptian mathematics and science influenced the Greeks. Bernal suggests that the influence may be quite large, and Palter argues that all existing evidence points to the influence being quite small. An important area in Palter's discussions is ancient astronomy, where Palter discusses the general character of Egyptian astronomy, and argues that some claims about it have been vastly exaggerated; much of this discussion focuses on discrediting claims made by John Pappademos. Palter then notes that Peter Tompkins, author of Secrets of the Great Pyramid, seems to suggest that Newton was led by Egyptian science to discover his law of gravitation. About Tompkins, Bernal writes that "it it a tragedy that Tompkins's brilliant and scholarly book has been stripped of its scholarly apparatus". Palter writes "It seems never to have occurred to Bernal that the absence of scholarly apparatus in Tompkins's account of Newton has a very simple explanation: no scholarly evidence exists to support that account." When discussing Egyptian mathematics proper, Palter focuses discusses the general character, and then square roots (or a relative lack of them), the value of pi, the controversial problem in the Moscow papyrus on the surface area of a basket, the Pythagorean theorem (or the relative lack of it, arguments on the special case of involving the diagonal of the square), and the notion (or absence of notion) of an irrational number. Palter attacks claims by Cheikh Anta Diop (see Civilization or barbarism: An authentic anthropology) that Archimedes stole some of his most famous mathematics from the Egyptians. Palter then discusses pyramidology, and some of the claims cited by Bernal that "one can find such relations as pi, phi, the 'golden number' and Pythagoras' triangle from them." The final section, discusses the similarities and differences between Egyptian and Greek medicine. Although Mathematics is not so directly involved here, strong Egyptian influence in Greek medicine could argue for the plausibility of influence of other Egyptian science on Greek science as well. A very interesting paper. Apart from the fact that Palter's article serves as a kind of review of Bernal's book, it is worth reading for its discussions on the nature of Egyptian mathematics and science. Bernal responds to Palter's article in Bernal, Martin, Response to a paper by R. Palter: "Black Athena, Afro-centrism, and the history of science" [Hist. Sci. 31 (1993), no. 93, part 3, 227--287; MR: 94i:01001]. Closely related topics: Ancient Egypt, Greece, Astronomy, The Egyptian Pyramids, Pythagorean Triangles and Triples, and Medicine.
Seidenberg, A. On the volume of a sphere. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 39 (1988), no. 2, 97--119. (Reviewer: K.-B. Gundlach.) SC: 01A20 (01A15 01A17 01A25 01A32), MR: 89j:01012.
Abraham Seidenberg argues that there is a common source for Pythagorean and Chinese (or Chinese-like) mathematics. He suggests that Old-Babylonian mathematics is a derivative of a more ancient mathematics having a much clearer geometric component (p. 104), and is "in some respects ... is derivative of a Chinese-like mathematics" (p. 109). Van der Waerden holds a similar view on this, and tells us that the mathematics of the Chiu Chang Suan Shu represents the common source more faithfully than the Babylonian does. Seidenberg believes that the common source is most similar to the Sulvasutras. He discusses how questions of the sphere and the circle were treated by the Greeks, Chinese, Egyptians, and to a lesser extent Indians. He discusses the some similarities and differences in the work on the sphere in Greece (Archimedes, with a very brief account of the application of his Method), and in Chinese (first in the Chiu Chang Suan Shu, improved by Liu Hui or perhaps Tsu Ch'ung-Chih, and then further improved by the Tsu Ch'ung-Chih's son Tsu Keng-Chih). He believes that the problem of the volume of a sphere goes back to the common source, to the first part of the second millennium B.C. or earlier. An interesting and related topic is the topic of the equality of the proportionality constants pi that occur in the formulas for the area and circumference of a circle. Seidenberg examines the Moscow Papyrus, Chinese sources, and an Old-Babylonian text and finds that this fact seemed to be recognized in all three groups. He argues that the Egyptian, Babylonian, and Chinese approaches to the volume of a truncated pyramid may have derived from the same common source. He believe that the common source also used infinitesimal, Cavalieri-type, arguments as well. It is interesting as well that Heron, who as Seidenberg notes is sometimes considered to be continuing the Babylonian tradition, gives the formula 1/2(s+p)p+1/14(1/2s)2 for the area of a segment of a circle with chord s and height (sagita, arrow) p (with an Archimedean value of 22/7 for pi), and "that the 'ancients' took [the area as] 1/2(s+p)p and even conjectured that they did so because they took pi = 3." The paper is also interesting in that he discusses the development of some of his ideas from his early papers in the 60s until much later (the paper was received soon before his death). Closely related topics: The Sphere, The Circle, The Pythagoreans, China, The Chiu Chang Suan Shu (Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art), Sumerians and Babylonians, The Sulvasutras, Archimedes' Method, The Moscow Mathematical Papyrus, Heron, and Abraham Seidenberg.
Swetz, Frank J. The Method of Archimedes. In Swetz, Frank J. From Five Fingers to Infinity. A Journey through the History of Mathematics. Open Court, Chicago, 1994. . 180--181.
Shows how Archimedes used his Method to discover the formula for the volume of a sphere. (Of course Archimedes also gave a rigorous proof using Eudoxus' Method of Exhaustion.) Closely related topics: Archimedes' Method, The Measurement of Area and Volume, and The Sphere.