To expand search, see Medieval Europe. Laterally related topics: Gerbert, Pope Sylvester II, The Liberal Arts, Alexander de Villa Dei, Sacrobosco (John of Holywood), Nicole Oresme, Hungary in the Middle Ages, De Vetula, England in the Middle Ages, and France in the Middle Ages.
The Mathematics and the Liberal Arts pages are intended to be a resource for student research projects and for teachers interested in using the history of mathematics in their courses. Many pages focus on ethnomathematics and in the connections between mathematics and other disciplines. The notes in these pages are intended as much to evoke ideas as to indicate what the books and articles are about. They are not intended as reviews. However, some items have been reviewed in Mathematical Reviews, published by The American Mathematical Society. When the mathematical review (MR) number and reviewer are known to the author of these pages, they are given as part of the bibliographic citation. Subscribing institutions can access the more recent MR reviews online through MathSciNet.
Biggs, N. L. The roots of combinatorics. Historia Math. 6 (1979), no. 2, 109--136. (Reviewer: J. Dieudonné.) SC: 05-03 (01A15 01A20 01A25 01A30 01A32 01A40 01A45), MR: 80h:05003.
(1) As the author explains, the most ancient problem connected with combinatorics may be the house-cat-mice-wheat problem of the Rhind Papyrus (Problem 79), which occurs in a similar form in a problem of Fibonacci's Liber Abaci and in an English nursery rhyme. All are concerned with successive powers of 7. (2) The first occurrence of combinatorics per se may be in the 64 hexagrams of the I Ching. (However, the more modern binary ordering of these is first seen in China in the 10th century.) A Chinese monk in the 700s may have had a rule for the number of configurations of a board game similar to go. In Greece, one of the very few references to combinatorics is a statement by Plutarch about the number of compound statements from 10 simple propositions; Plutarch quotes Chrysippus, Hipparchus, and Xenocrates on the subject, so all apparently had some interest in the subject. (Plutarch's statement is also discussed in a recent article in the Monthly.) Boethius apparently had a rule for the number of combinations of n things taken two at a time. The author discusses interest in combinatorics in the Hindu world, by the Jainas, Varahamihira, and Bhaskara (the latter in the Lilavati). The work of Brahmagupta should be relevant, but is not currently available in English. The Arabs seem to have adopted their combinatorics from the Hindus. The author also briefly discusses some interest in combinatorics in the Jewish mathematical tradition; two examples are Rabbi ben Ezra and Levi ben Gerson. (3) Magic squares may first occur in the lo shu diagram, which is often linked with the I Ching. The author discusses how the idea of magic squares may have entered the Islamic world, was then improved, appeared in the work of Manuel Moschopoulos, and possibly through him entered the Western world. What happened in China is less clear. As the author suggests, the the work of Yang Hui suggests that there had been a Chinese tradition of work in magic squares, already dead by Yang Hui's time. For example, the squares Yang Hui gives are not of types found elsewhere. In addition, Yang Hui seems unclear on the techniques for construction. It is interesting that De la Loubčre learned of a simple method for constructing magic squares in Siam. The author also discusses: the possibility of a Hindu study of magic squares; the presumably Arab source of Western magic square mysticism; and later developments, such as Euler's questions on orthogonal Latin squares. (4) The author discusses how questions in partitions arose in gambling, such as the throwing of astrogali (huckle bones, which can land 4 ways) or dice (which can land in 6 ways). An early systematic study is in the late Medieval Latin poem De Vetula, which gives the number of ways you can obtain any given total from a throw of 3 dice. Cardano and Galileo examined the subject in more depth. (5) Combinatorial thinking in games and puzzles. Discusses the wolf-goat-cabbage, attributed to Alcuin. [Similar puzzles also occur in a variety of other cultures, but are not discussed in this article.] Also discusses the Josephus problem, based on a process similar to the childhood process of "counting-out". The Josephus problem is named for the Jewish historian Josephus of the 1st century AD, who supposedly saved his life with a correct solution. This problem unexpectedly turned up in Japan. (6) The author discusses how "Pascal's" triangle was possibly known to Omar Khayyam in the context of taking roots. The Hindu scholar Pingala may have known a method, but the case is more cryptic. At any rate, it was known by the time of Halayudha, who may have lived in the 900s AD. A more clear-cut reference occurs in the work of Nasir al-Din al-Tusi in 1265. In China, the triangle appears in the work of Chu Shih-Chieh (1303), but may have been very ancient by then. The triangle was used by Pascal and Fermat to resolve the "problem of points". This problem had the goal of determining how to distribute stakes when a game ends early. ... Excellent article. Closely related topics: Combinatorics, The Rhind/Ahmes Papyrus, The I Ching, Logic, Plutarch, Chrysippus, Hipparchus, Xenocrates, Boethius (Ancius Manlius Torquatus Severinus Boetius), Jainism, Varahamihira, Brahmagupta, Bhaskara, The Islamic World, The Jewish Tradition, Rabbi ben Ezra, Levi ben Gerson, Magic Squares, Manuel Moschopoulos, Yang Hui, Siam, Mathematics and Mysticism, Leonhard Euler, Gambling, De Vetula, Girolamo Cardano, Galileo Galilei, Puzzles, Alcuin, The Josephus Problem, Japan, Pascal's Triangle, Omar Khayyam (abu-l-Fath Omar ibn Ibrahim Khayyam), Pingala, Halayudha, Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, Chu Shih-chieh, Blaise Pascal, and Pierre de Fermat.
Gardner, Arthur O. The History of Mathematics as a Part of the History of Mankind. Mathematics Teacher 61 (1968), 524--26.
Briefly discusses how factors such as religion and warfare have influenced the development of mathematics. Attributes the success of Leonardo of Pisa (Fibonacci) to the unconventional ideas of his sovereign, Emperor Frederick II of the house of Hanover. Martin Luther is an example of an important theologian who supported mathematics: "If I had children, they should not only study language and history, but they should also learn singing and music, together with the whole of mathematics." Reprinted in Swetz, Frank J., From Five Fingers to Infinity. Closely related topics: Religion and Warfare.
King, Charles. Leonardo Fibonacci. Fibonacci Quarterly 1 (1963), 15--19.
A brief survey of the work of Fibonacci, Leonardo of Pisa. Reprinted in Swetz, Frank J., From Five Fingers to Infinity.
Loeb, A. L. The magic of the pentangle: dynamic symmetry from Merlin to Penrose. Symmetry 2: unifying human understanding, Part 1. Comput. Math. Appl. 17 (1989), no. 1-3, 33--48. (Reviewer: Marjorie Senechal.) SC: 01A99 (01A10 52-03), MR: 91a:01058a.
In this interesting and entertaining article, Merlin the magician assists Arthur and Key in exploring the secrets of dynamic symmetry (in a problem with four beetles in a square always walking towards each other), in the logarithmic spiral (the curve generated by the beetles), the golden rectangle (and its own associated spiral), and the Fibonacci numbers. The article closes with a discussion of the pentangle, which the author says "is central to the late fourteenth-century 'Sir Gawain and the Green Knight', to medieval sign theory as well as to recent research in quasi-periodic alloy crystals. The Socratic discussions here could be turned used as active learning exercises for talented students. Highly recommended. Closely related topics: England in the Middle Ages, Dynamic Symmetry, Spirals, Proportion and the Golden Ratio, The Pentagram, and Education.
Lumpkin, Beatrice. From Egypt to Benjamin Banneker: African origins of false position solutions. Vita mathematica (Toronto, ON, 1992; Quebec City, PQ, 1992), 279--289, MAA Notes, 40, Math. Assoc. America, Washington, DC, 1996. SC: 01A05 (01A13), MR: 1 391 748.
Discusses the work of the Benjamin Banneker, who is perhaps the most interesting early American mathematician. The author gives a fine introduction to Banneker's life; this is necessarily brief, because as the author observes, his house burned down on the day of his funeral, destroying almost all his papers. She notes that there were hints of his genius starting with his building of a wood clock at the age of 22 (he used a borrowed pocket watch as a model; unfortunately, the clock was destroyed in the fire); he thereafter became famous for his ability to solve and create mathematical puzzles. "People sent him puzzles from all over the colonies and later from the new republic." His work became more serious when he was 57 and borrowed some books and astronomy instruments from a neighbor. He taught himself the mathematics he needed to become an astronomer, and published local almanacs including things such as the planetary positions and the times of sunrise, sunset, moonrise, moonset, eclipses, and tides. "Based on Banneker's work on his almanac, he was appointed an astronomer on the team of surveyors that drew up the outline for the new nation's capital, Washington, DC. Banneker was appointed because he was one of the few in the country capable of doing such work. Charles Leadbetter, author of an astronomy book that Banneker studied, wrote that knowledge of astronomy in London was 'so rare, ... not one of 20,000 hath attained to it.' Knowledge of astronomer", Lumpkin continues, "was even rarer in the new United States. Banneker's work so impressed Thomas Jefferson, then Secretary of State, that he wrote Banneker that he was sending a copy of the almanac to the Paris Academy of Sciences." Most amazing of all is that Banneker accomplished all this as an African American who had spent most of his life thus far hard physical labor. After this introduction, the author focuses on how Banneker and other mathematicians used the rule of false position. She notes, the rule of false position was used by the Egyptians in the time of the Rhind Papyrus and in a variety of other Egyptian sources (e.g., the Kahun and Berlin papyri), in the work of Alexandrian Greeks like Diophantus (c. 250 AD), in the work of Islamic mathematicians such as Abu Kamil (b. 850 AD), and in the work of the mathematician Leonardo of Pisa (Fibonacci) (who was also influenced by the work in Northern Africa). The author then discusses some interesting false position problems from Banneker's own work. Closely related topics: Benjamin Banneker, The Method of False Position, The Rhind/Ahmes Papyrus, Ancient Egypt, Diophantus, and Abu Kamil (b. 850).
McClendon, R. B. Leonardo of Pisa and His Liber quadratorum. American Mathematical Monthly 26 (1919), 1--8.
The author discusses some of the most important work in Fibonacci's Liber quadratorum, and convincingly makes the case that Leonardo was the greatest genius in number theory between Diophantus and Fermat. Reprinted in Swetz, Frank J., From Five Fingers to Infinity. Closely related topic: Number Theory.
Petruso, Karl M. Additive progression in prehistoric mathematics: a conjecture. Historia Math. 12 (1985), no. 2, 101--106. (Reviewer: Garry J. Tee.) SC: 01A10 (01A15), MR: 86m:01005.
A collection of stone balance weights was recovered from a Late Bronze Age ship (c. 1200 BC) that sank off the coast of southern Turkey (near Cape Gelidonya, modern Finike). Some of these weights are sphendonoid in shape ("approximately the shape of an olive pit"), and appear to be multiples 1, 3, 5, 7, 12, 31, 50, and 54 of a hypothetical unit weight of 9.3 grams (the error is within about 2 percent). There are five weights of 7, and one weight of each of the others. Initially, these balance weights defied analysis, but the author (Petruso) realized that they nearly form a Fibonacci series; he posits the existence of missing weight of 2 and 19. Two problems with this interpretation are the fact that a weight of 7 occurs instead of a weight of 8, and the fact that the weight of 54 does not fit into his system. He suggests that the weight of 8 is a "purposeful and quite utilitarian shift in the basic Fibonacci series .... [to] allow the generation of a 50-unit (rather than 55-unit) mass further along the series." He also notes that the units of 19+31+50 would conveniently add up to 100. As for the 54 unit weight, "it might well have had a specific, idiosyncratic (industrial) purpose which is now lost to us." The author notes that one particular advantage of the Fibonacci-like system is that the accuracy of the individual weights could be quickly checked: for example, one can weigh the 12 against the 5 and the 7. Altogether a fascinating theory, readily readable. Closely related topics: The Balance and the Measurement of Weight, Archaeology, and The Late Bronze Age.