Myth and Ritual - Mathematics and the Liberal Arts

Myth and Ritual - Mathematics and the Liberal Arts

To expand search, see Language and Literature, Philosophy, and Anthropology, General. Laterally related topics: Mathematics in Language, The Development of Writing, Storytelling Traditions, Literature, Shakespeare, Language and Linguistics, Paradox, The Philosophy of Mathematics, and Kinship Systems.

The Mathematics and the Liberal Arts pages are intended to be a resource for student research projects and for teachers interested in using the history of mathematics in their courses. Many pages focus on ethnomathematics and in the connections between mathematics and other disciplines. The notes in these pages are intended as much to evoke ideas as to indicate what the books and articles are about. They are not intended as reviews. However, some items have been reviewed in Mathematical Reviews, published by The American Mathematical Society. When the mathematical review (MR) number and reviewer are known to the author of these pages, they are given as part of the bibliographic citation. Subscribing institutions can access the more recent MR reviews online through MathSciNet.


Seidenberg, A. The ritual origin of counting. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 2 (1962b), 1-40.

It is common to argue that counting and other elementary mathematics arose spontaneously throughout the world in response to a practical, or perhaps psychological, need. Abraham Seidenberg argues instead for a diffusion theory, that counting arose only once, and then spread throughout the world. In fact, many common associations with numbers suggest such a common origin. One such association that Seidenberg is the idea that odd numbers are male and even numbers are female; this is certainly well known from the Pythagoreans, but turns out to be nearly universal. Seidenberg proposes that counting in fact originally arose in a ritual context. Seidenberg draws from a wide variety of anthropological sources for rituals and myths that hint at what this common origin might have been. He finds that counting "was frequently the central feature of a rite, and that participants in ritual were numbered." He focuses more specifically on creation rituals. He suggests that in the enaction of creation myths, men and women may have come onto the scene alternately, easily explaining the odd/male even/female association. He finds that his ideas clarify "pure 2-counting, which is the oldest stratum of counting we can detect." In pure-2 counting, there are separate words for one and two and these are used to form all other number words. He illustrates this with number words from diverse languages such as the Gumulgal of Australia, the Bakairi of South America, and the Bushmen of South Africa. He sheds additional light on his hypothesis with discussions of the possible origin of counting taboos (and connections with ritual sacrifice), of ancient one-one-correspondence "tally" systems (e.g., counting people with stones), of taxation systems, of money, and of gematria. Seidenberg also gives us some fascinating examples of counting in world religions. These include the analogy The Lord : His people = the shepherd : his sheep, the analogy The shepherd : his sheep = the moon : the stars. These two lead one to expect the moon to count the stars; and Seidenberg in fact finds evidence of this in ancient Babylonia. He argues from the equation The Lord's people = the stars of the heaven to The Lord's people = the sand upon the seashore that one would expect to find a ritual counting of sand. In fact, he finds the notion of Counter of the Sands both in Buddhism and among the Ancient Greeks. The equation The Lord = The Counter seems to be confirmed in two of the ninety-nine beautiful names of Allah, namely The Counter and the Reckoner; and there is further confirmation in Chapter's XV and XIX of the Qu'ran. This is a fascinating article, connecting mathematics with a wide variety of disciplines. Closely related topics: Storytelling Traditions, Anthropology, General, Counting, TallySystems, Taxation, Number Words, The Pythagoreans, Gematria, Religion, The Islamic World, and Abraham Seidenberg.

Make comment on this entry

Seidenberg, A. The ritual origin of the circle and square. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 25 (1981), no. 4, 269--327. (Reviewer: M. P. Closs.) SC: 01A10 (51-03), MR: 83h:01008.

Abraham Seidenberg advances a theory that the circle first arose in the context of the ritual enactment of a creation myth. In many cases, stars seem to play an important role in these myths. Seidenberg's research suggests that participants in these myths generally moved in a circle in imitation of the stars in the heavens. It is interesting that individuals in these societies often move in the same direction as the stars, and movement in the opposite direction is often considered unlucky. The fact that the Aztec god Tezcatlipoca is missing is right foot, forcing him to walk clockwise in a circle may be related. Seidenberg suggests that the creation myth is the origin for the dance around the may pole, which is for example observed near the summer solstice in northern Scandinavia today. Analogous rituals may play (or have played) a role in a wide variety of other cultures as well; examples are found in the Aztecs, ancient Indians, American Indians, and Greeks. (Spinning tops may have a ritual significance as well.) Special support is given to Seidenberg's these through the fact that in some cases, a pole may have been set up at an angle so as to point towards the pole star. Seidenberg notes that the moon might have motivated the circle rather than the stars, but the sun is unlikely to. His investigations tend to confirm this, and also suggest that lunar culture is older than solar culture. Seidenberg believes that the square arose from the circle, through the process of dividing a group into a dual organization, where for example members of one group marry someone in the other group and also (as he notes) play complementary roles in ritual. If a society divides a second time, one can think of it dividing the tribal circle into four parts. He finds some evidence of this as well. The four parts naturally define a square. His theory therefore implies that the circle arose first and that the square arose as a dual form of the circle; there is some other evidence (e.g., architectural) that may tend to confirm this. Seidenberg mentions several interesting dualities involving the circle and the square. The Altar of Heaven in Peking, for example, exhibits the equations Heaven : Earth = circle : square = three : two = South : North = White : Yellow. In Sinhalese art he finds the equation circle : square = standing : sitting. In the Omaha tribe he finds the equations that Sky : Earth = superior : inferior = one : two. He also notes the equations Heaven : Earth = Male : Female and Male : Female = one : two. The former is well known, and the latter is extensively discussed in Seidenberg, A., The ritual origin of counting The ancient Egyptians appear to be an exception as they associated the square with the earth and the circle with the sky. A fascinating paper. Closely related topics: Religion, Anthropology, General, The Circle, Kinship Systems, The Square, and Abraham Seidenberg.

Make comment on this entry

Seidenberg, A. and Casey, J. The ritual origin of the balance. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 23 (1980/81), no. 3, 179--226. (Reviewer: M. P. Closs.) SC: 01A10, MR: 82j:01008.

The author's trace the beginnings of the balance back to a rituals where principals contended against each other on a kind of see-saw (somewhat similar sports are of course known from medieval times). The grain-crusher and water-lifter are similar, and perhaps derived from, the see-saw; the fact that one stands on these suggested to the authors that the contestants may have been standing on the see-saw. The authors note that in ancient Egypt, one's heart was believed to be weighed against a feather in order to decide whether one would be able to enter the afterlife. Other parts of the body, such as hair, can be used to represent an individual, and in other instances these may have been weighed instead; the authors give examples of rites where hair is weighed. An interesting use of the balance in Greece is from the Iliad where Zeus weighs Achilles and Hector on pans of a balance. "That of Hector sinks toward Hades and Hector falls, slain by Achilles." An even more interesting weighing ritual was once common in the far east, where a ruler was balanced against a quantity of a precious substance such as gold, and gave that substance (and thereby symbolically himself) to his people. The authors found many other interesting examples in a wide variety of cultures and world religions. The authors believe that only items of ritual significance were weighed at first, and that widespread commercial use came much later. Although the authors don't focus greatly on this, they also briefly discuss the different kinds of balances (and the balance-like instrument used to carry loads on the shoulders) and the weight multiples that were used on balances. Closely related topics: The Balance and the Measurement of Weight, Religion, Sports, Ancient Egypt, Greece, The Islamic World, and Abraham Seidenberg.

Make comment on this entry


Make comment on this category

Make comment on this project