To expand search, see Physics. Laterally related topics: Dynamics, Force, and Motion and Acoustics.
The Mathematics and the Liberal Arts pages are intended to be a resource for student research projects and for teachers interested in using the history of mathematics in their courses. Many pages focus on ethnomathematics and in the connections between mathematics and other disciplines. The notes in these pages are intended as much to evoke ideas as to indicate what the books and articles are about. They are not intended as reviews. However, some items have been reviewed in Mathematical Reviews, published by The American Mathematical Society. When the mathematical review (MR) number and reviewer are known to the author of these pages, they are given as part of the bibliographic citation. Subscribing institutions can access the more recent MR reviews online through MathSciNet.
Cox, Steven J. The shape of the ideal column. Math. Intelligencer 14 (1992), no. 1, 16--24. (Reviewer: Peeter Müürsepp.) SC: 01A99 (00A69), MR: 93a:01072.
Discusses the shape of the "ideal" column. Shows how the aesthetic and perceptual ideals of Greek and Roman times were relayed by Vitruvius and later by Alberti and others. Then shows how later scientists considered the problem from the point of view of structural strength instead. A key player in this new point of view was Lagrange. The author discusses mistakes in Lagrange's work and in the work of some later scientists and mathematicians. It is interesting that the author himself has made investigations in this area (together with M. L. Overton). The article Kirmser, Philip G. and Hu, Kuo-Kuang, The shape of the ideal column reconsidered is critical of these investigations, and includes a response by Cox. Closely related topics: The Column, Vitruvius, Leone Battista Alberti (1404?--1472), and Joseph Louis Lagrange.
Kirmser, Philip G. and Hu, Kuo-Kuang. The shape of the ideal column reconsidered. With a reply by Steven Cox. Math. Intelligencer 15 (1993), no. 3, 62--68. (Reviewer: Peeter Müürsepp.) SC: 73K05 (00A69 01A99 49N55 73H05), MR: 94e:73039.
This article criticizes some of the conclusions of Cox, Steven J., The shape of the ideal column, and contains a new derivation of the shape of the "ideal" column. In Cox's view the problem of the ideal column remains far from solved. Cox acknowledges some of the criticism, but in turn objects to the way Kirmser and Hu have had tacitly assumed the existence of a strongest column in order, which he considers far from clear. He says "Faced with their outright contempt for the question of existence of a strongest column, I find solace in L. C. Young's invocation of Perron's paradox." (This paradox starts "Let N be the largest positive integer", and then shows that there exists a larger number.) The mathematics involved is somewhat technical. Closely related topics: The Column and Paradox.