To refine search, see subtopic Leonhard Euler. To expand search, see Switzerland and The 1700s. Laterally related topics: Russia in the 1700s, France in the 1700s, Austria in the 1700s, Germany in the 1700s, and The United States in the 1700s.
The Mathematics and the Liberal Arts pages are intended to be a resource for student research projects and for teachers interested in using the history of mathematics in their courses. Many pages focus on ethnomathematics and in the connections between mathematics and other disciplines. The notes in these pages are intended as much to evoke ideas as to indicate what the books and articles are about. They are not intended as reviews. However, some items have been reviewed in Mathematical Reviews, published by The American Mathematical Society. When the mathematical review (MR) number and reviewer are known to the author of these pages, they are given as part of the bibliographic citation. Subscribing institutions can access the more recent MR reviews online through MathSciNet.
Biggs, N. L. The roots of combinatorics. Historia Math. 6 (1979), no. 2, 109--136. (Reviewer: J. Dieudonné.) SC: 05-03 (01A15 01A20 01A25 01A30 01A32 01A40 01A45), MR: 80h:05003.
(1) As the author explains, the most ancient problem connected with combinatorics may be the house-cat-mice-wheat problem of the Rhind Papyrus (Problem 79), which occurs in a similar form in a problem of Fibonacci's Liber Abaci and in an English nursery rhyme. All are concerned with successive powers of 7. (2) The first occurrence of combinatorics per se may be in the 64 hexagrams of the I Ching. (However, the more modern binary ordering of these is first seen in China in the 10th century.) A Chinese monk in the 700s may have had a rule for the number of configurations of a board game similar to go. In Greece, one of the very few references to combinatorics is a statement by Plutarch about the number of compound statements from 10 simple propositions; Plutarch quotes Chrysippus, Hipparchus, and Xenocrates on the subject, so all apparently had some interest in the subject. (Plutarch's statement is also discussed in a recent article in the Monthly.) Boethius apparently had a rule for the number of combinations of n things taken two at a time. The author discusses interest in combinatorics in the Hindu world, by the Jainas, Varahamihira, and Bhaskara (the latter in the Lilavati). The work of Brahmagupta should be relevant, but is not currently available in English. The Arabs seem to have adopted their combinatorics from the Hindus. The author also briefly discusses some interest in combinatorics in the Jewish mathematical tradition; two examples are Rabbi ben Ezra and Levi ben Gerson. (3) Magic squares may first occur in the lo shu diagram, which is often linked with the I Ching. The author discusses how the idea of magic squares may have entered the Islamic world, was then improved, appeared in the work of Manuel Moschopoulos, and possibly through him entered the Western world. What happened in China is less clear. As the author suggests, the the work of Yang Hui suggests that there had been a Chinese tradition of work in magic squares, already dead by Yang Hui's time. For example, the squares Yang Hui gives are not of types found elsewhere. In addition, Yang Hui seems unclear on the techniques for construction. It is interesting that De la Loubčre learned of a simple method for constructing magic squares in Siam. The author also discusses: the possibility of a Hindu study of magic squares; the presumably Arab source of Western magic square mysticism; and later developments, such as Euler's questions on orthogonal Latin squares. (4) The author discusses how questions in partitions arose in gambling, such as the throwing of astrogali (huckle bones, which can land 4 ways) or dice (which can land in 6 ways). An early systematic study is in the late Medieval Latin poem De Vetula, which gives the number of ways you can obtain any given total from a throw of 3 dice. Cardano and Galileo examined the subject in more depth. (5) Combinatorial thinking in games and puzzles. Discusses the wolf-goat-cabbage, attributed to Alcuin. [Similar puzzles also occur in a variety of other cultures, but are not discussed in this article.] Also discusses the Josephus problem, based on a process similar to the childhood process of "counting-out". The Josephus problem is named for the Jewish historian Josephus of the 1st century AD, who supposedly saved his life with a correct solution. This problem unexpectedly turned up in Japan. (6) The author discusses how "Pascal's" triangle was possibly known to Omar Khayyam in the context of taking roots. The Hindu scholar Pingala may have known a method, but the case is more cryptic. At any rate, it was known by the time of Halayudha, who may have lived in the 900s AD. A more clear-cut reference occurs in the work of Nasir al-Din al-Tusi in 1265. In China, the triangle appears in the work of Chu Shih-Chieh (1303), but may have been very ancient by then. The triangle was used by Pascal and Fermat to resolve the "problem of points". This problem had the goal of determining how to distribute stakes when a game ends early. ... Excellent article. Closely related topics: Combinatorics, The Rhind/Ahmes Papyrus, Leonardo of Pisa (Fibonacci), The I Ching, Logic, Plutarch, Chrysippus, Hipparchus, Xenocrates, Boethius (Ancius Manlius Torquatus Severinus Boetius), Jainism, Varahamihira, Brahmagupta, Bhaskara, The Islamic World, The Jewish Tradition, Rabbi ben Ezra, Levi ben Gerson, Magic Squares, Manuel Moschopoulos, Yang Hui, Siam, Mathematics and Mysticism, Leonhard Euler, Gambling, De Vetula, Girolamo Cardano, Galileo Galilei, Puzzles, Alcuin, The Josephus Problem, Japan, Pascal's Triangle, Omar Khayyam (abu-l-Fath Omar ibn Ibrahim Khayyam), Pingala, Halayudha, Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, Chu Shih-chieh, Blaise Pascal, and Pierre de Fermat.
Scriba, Christoph J. Mathematics and music. (Danish) Normat 38 (1990), no. 1, 3--17, 52. SC: 01A99 (00A69), MR: 91i:01154.
The author discusses the relationship between mathematics and music from Pythagorean through modern times. His story begins in in Pythagorean times, and as he explains, the notes of the musical scale were then determined by the ratio of a perfect fifth, i.e. 3:2. Twelve intervals of a fifth are roughly equal to seven octaves, but are in reality slightly more than seven octaves, the discrepancy being the "Pythagorean comma" of 312:219, or roughly 74:73. Whole steps in the scale were in the ratio 9:8, and half steps were in the ratio 256:243. Thus two half steps were slightly less than one whole step. In fact, Philolaus noted that one whole note is equal to two half notes plus a Pythagorean comma. Archytas showed that intervals like the octave 2:1, fifth 3:2, fourth 4:3, and whole tone 9:8, or any other interval in the ratio (n+1):n cannot in fact be divided with rational numbers into two equal intervals. However, he noted that the product of the arithmetic mean and the harmonic mean is equal to the square of the geometric mean, so this gave a way of dividing the fifth of 3:2 into the product of 5:4 and 6:5. 5:4 can be thought of as a major third, and 6:5 can be though of as a minor third. So the ratio 3:2 is divided as 6:5:4. Similarly, the fourth of 4:3 can be divided into the product of 7:6 and 8:7, so the ratio 4:3 is divided as 8:7:6. The interval 7:6 can be though of as a shrunken minor third and 8:7 can be though of as an enlarged whole tone. Scriba suggests that the germs of the idea of making this division lie with the Babylonians.In the Renaissance, the musical scale was modified to take some of these ideas into account through the work of theoreticians like Ludovico Fogliano and Giusseppe Zarlino. For example, the ratio for the notes E:C and A:F were changed from the Pythagorean 81:64 (two whole tones) to the ratio 5:4. B moved to stay a whole tone of 9:8 above A. Thus the half tones F:E and c:B were now in the ratio 16:15 rather than the Pythagorean 256:243. The whole tones C:D, F:G, and A:B remained in the ratio 9:8, but the whole tones D:E and G:A were now in the ratio 10:9. (It was roughly in the same time interval that intervals of a third began to be considered consonant.) Sharps and flats did not coincide: C sharp and D flat were for example different notes. However, it wasn't long before there were efforts to make a scale of 12 uniform steps. The first to attempt to do so was Galileo Galilei's father, Vincenso Galilei. He tried to make each step of size 18:17, though that of course led to problems. It was Simon Stevin who first had the idea of making uniform steps of size 21/12.
Later on, some mathematicians even began to question the division of the scale into 12 tones, with the idea that a division into a different number of notes might lead to a more perfect representation of the intervals. For example Christiaan Huygens defined a 31-tone system of temperament in his Lettre touchant le cycle harmonique. One source even suggests that this has "led indirectly to a tradition of 31-tone music in the Netherlands in this century". Leonhard Euler's efforts involved an attempt to reconcile the ideal "octave" 2:1 with the ideal "fifth" 3:2. He analyzed the problem by using a continued fraction representation of the ratio log 2:log 3/2. The convergent 12/7 corresponds to the popular division of 7 octaves into a circle of 12 fifths. Other convergents include 17/12, 29/17, 41/24, and 53/31. In the last case, for example, 31 octaves would be divided into 53 fifths. These didn't answer the question of what kind of equally tempered scale best reconciles the intervals of an octave, fifth, and third (2:1, 3:2, and 5:4) simultaneously. This may or may not influence the course of music, but Scriba shows how an algorithm by the Norwegian mathematician Viggo Brun (1885-1978) gives an answer. If the best answers are written in terms of the number of steps in the three intervals, the best approximations are (2,1,1), (3,2,1), (5,3,2), (7,4,2), (12,7,4), (19,11,6), (31,18,10), (34,20,11), (53,31,17), (87,51,28), .... The triple (12,7,4) is the common case with 12 semitones in an octave, 7 in a "major fifth", and 4 in a "major third". As Scriba explains, the case of the 31 tone scale has been especially important historically. In fact, Scriba tells us that it was back in the middle of the 1600s that Nicolas Vicentino described a "archicembalo" with six manuals with the octave divided into 31 parts; as mentioned above, Huygens clarified this. Moreover, Scriba tells us that Zarlino and Salinas shortly thereafter discussed the division of the octave into 19 equal parts. There is apparently an organ built according to the principles of the Dutch physicist D. Fokker (1887-1972) that also divides the octave into 31 parts (it is now in the Teylers Museum in Haarlem). Along a different line, Euler tried to design a mathematical system to quantify the dissonance of chords, but it apparently did not work very well.
The next part of the article discusses some of the work of Wolfgang Graesers (1906-1928), who tried to do a mathematical study of Bach's Art of the Fugue (this was published under the name Bachs "Kunst der Fuge" (German) in the Bach-Jahrbuch 1924, pages 1-104). Here, group theoretic notions reflect the kinds of transformations, such as inversion, that can be used in a fugue. A background in music theory may be useful in understanding Graesers's work.