To expand search, see Germany in the 1500s. Laterally related topic: Erhard Schön.
The Mathematics and the Liberal Arts pages are intended to be a resource for student research projects and for teachers interested in using the history of mathematics in their courses. Many pages focus on ethnomathematics and in the connections between mathematics and other disciplines. The notes in these pages are intended as much to evoke ideas as to indicate what the books and articles are about. They are not intended as reviews. However, some items have been reviewed in Mathematical Reviews, published by The American Mathematical Society. When the mathematical review (MR) number and reviewer are known to the author of these pages, they are given as part of the bibliographic citation. Subscribing institutions can access the more recent MR reviews online through MathSciNet.
Andersen, Kirsti. The mathematical treatment of anamorphoses from Piero della Francesca to Niceron. History of mathematics: states of the art, 3--28, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1996.
Discusses the mathematics of anamorphoses and the history of the subject from the mathematical point of view. Begins with a short discussion of problems stemming from the well-known fact that cylindrical columns seem smaller towards the top. Dürer discussed how one can use letters of different size on such a column so that rows of print will all appear the same size. His student Erhard Schön did some work using anamorphoses proper. (This was about the same time as Hans Holbein's Ambassadors.) Piero della Francesca's De Prospectiva Pingendi includes a discussion of how to construct a particular anamorphic drawing, but little further progress was made until the 1600s. The author notes that artists didn't seem to use the same mathematical techniques when using more extreme perspectives as they used with more normal perspectives. In fact, written works from the time suggest that orthogonal projections were used. The author gives examples from the work of of Daniele Barbaro [Italy 1500s], Paolo Giovanni Lomazzo [Italy 1500s], Egnazio Danti [Italy 1500s], Guidobaldo del Monte [France 1600s], Samuel Marolois [France 1600s], and Salomon de Caus [France 1600s]. (The case of Lomazzo is unclear: he suggested using threads for the construction, but didn't state clearly how they were to be used.) After Niceron, more mathematically accurate techniques were used; the author gives an example of a work by Emmanuel Maignan [France 1600s], who was influenced by Niceron. The problems of mirror anamorphoses apparently originated in China by about 1600. Artists apparently either worked intuitively (as in China), or by using approximate constructions. Approximate constructions still appear today in the work of the 20th century Swedish artist Hans Hamngren. A mathematically precise treatment of the problem (and of a problem using a conical mirror) was given by Jean-Louis Vaulezard in the 1600s, but even Niceron gave only an approximate method. The author suggests that Vaulezard's students were perhaps the only ones who constructed curved-mirror anamorphoses using mathematically accurate methods. (Computer analyses might be useful to verify this.) Using a computer algebra system, the author has derived the equations for the curves which will project to a coordinate grid. The curve is not given in the text, but the author tells us that it is not one of the familiar curves, has degree 6, and has rather complicated coefficients. Closely related topics: Anamorphoses, The Column, Erhard Schön, Piero della Francesca, China, Jean-Louis Vaulezard, and Jean-François Niceron.Modify notes on this entry Modify bibliography entry Make comment on this entry
Emmer, Michele. Art and mathematics: the Platonic solids. The Visual Mind, 215--220, Leonardo Book Series, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993.
The author begins by mentioning some ancient representations of Platonic solids. These include a pair of Egyptian die from the Ptolemaic dynasty, an Etruscan dodecahedron (at least 2500 years old), two Celtic dodecahedra, and a West German dodecahedron from the 2nd century BC. The author continues with a discussion of the regular solids in Plato's Timaeus. The author notes that Dürer's Melancholia, which includes a truncated rhombohedron, is sometimes thought to show the influence of Luca Pacioli. The magic square in the painting gives some evidence for this; Dürer's engraving may be one of the earliest depictions of a magic squares in the West, but an earlier manuscript by Pacioli showed an interest in them. On the other hand, Luca Pacioli's De Divina Proportione relied heavily on, and perhaps even appropriated the work of Piero della Francesca. The book is also notable for its pictures of the regular solids, attributed to Leonardo da Vinci. Also discusses work on the regular solids due to Johannes Kepler, including Kepler's recognition of a duality and his idea of a combination of two tetrahedra called a stella octangula. The author notes that the notion of the stella octangula also appears in Pacioli's De Divina Proportione. In addition, Kepler's stellated dodecahedron occurs in mosaics in the San Macro Cathedral in Venice; this work is thought to have been done by Paolo Uccello. Regarding Uccello, the author quotes Donatello as saying to his close friend "Ah Paolo, this perspective of yours makes you neglect what we know for what we don't know. These things are no use except for marquetry." (The source is Vasari's Vita di Paolo Uccello.) The author, Michele Emmer, collaborated on the film Art and Mathematics. Closely related topics: The Regular Solids, Plato, Art, The Etruscans, Germany in Ancient Times, The Celts, Luca Pacioli, Magic Squares, Piero della Francesca, Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519), Paolo Uccello (1397-1475), Johannes Kepler (1571-1630), and Perspective.Modify notes on this entry Modify bibliography entry Make comment on this entry
Kemp, Martin. Spirals of life: D'Arcy Thompson and Theodore Cook, with Leonardo and Dürer in retrospect. Physis Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci. (N.S.) 32 (1995), no. 1, 37--54. SC: 01A99 (92-03), MR: 96j:01047.
Discusses theories of how art appears in biology. The author starts with St. Augustine, who concluded "If, then, we argue from the facts, first, that as everyone admits, not a single visible organ of the body serving a definite function is lacking in beauty, and, second, that there are some parts which have beauty and no apparent function, it follows, I think, that in the creation of the human body God put form before function." The author then discusses and compares the investigations of D'Arcy Thompson and Theodore Cook into the mathematical/biological manifestations of the spiral. Thompson and Cook agreed on many issues, though Thompson didn't approve of the "mystical conceptions" that he found in Cook's work. Specific topics discussed include the appearance of the golden ratio in biological systems (often in the guise of the Fibonacci series), turbulence, and transformations that take one biological object into a related one (one of Thompson's examples compares the skulls of Hyrachyus agrarius and Aceratherium tridactylum). In the process, the author touches on the work of Albrecht Dürer and Leonardo da Vinci (as the title suggests). Obviously, this article can not to be comprehensive, and the author himself tells us that the article is itself intended as a preface; it serves this function well. Both Thompson and Cook were well aware of the mathematical difficulties involved in thoroughly understanding the phenomena they wrote of. Cook wrote "It would only be possible to imagine life or beauty as being 'strictly' mathematical" if we ourselves were such infinitely capable mathematicians as to be able to formulate their characteristics in mathematics so extremely complex that we have never yet invented them." And Thompson wrote "And just as in the very simplest of actual cases we meet with a departure from such symmetry as could only exist under conditions of ideal simplicity, so do we pass quickly to cases where the interference of numerous, though still perhaps very simple, causes leads to a resultant which lies beyond our powers of analysis." The author writes that Thompson ended his book with "a plea for biological mathematicians and mathematical biologists to cultivate 'a field which few have entered and no man has explored'". He continues "Thompson's plea did not fall upon deaf ears, but it is only recently that new techniques of computer modeling have begun to realize something of the potential of some of his techniques." Closely related topics: Art, Biology, Spirals, Topology, Proportion and the Golden Ratio, and Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519).Modify notes on this entry Modify bibliography entry Make comment on this entry
Modify this category Add bibliography entry Make comment on this category